4 very very famous articles (in my field of course) are
Hikosaka, O. & Wurtz, R.H. (1983a) Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. IV. Relation of substantia nigra to superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol., 49, 1285–1301.
Hikosaka, O. & Wurtz, R.H. (1983b) Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. II. Visual responses related to fixation of gaze. J. Neurophysiol., 49, 1254–1267.
Hikosaka, O. & Wurtz, R.H. (1983c) Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. I. Relation of visual and auditory responses to saccades. J. Neurophysiol., 49, 1230–1253.
Hikosaka, O. & Wurtz, R.H. (1983d) Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. III. Memory-contingent visual and saccade responses. J. Neurophysiol., 49, 1268–1284.
but medeley sorts them wrong, as seen above. people know 1983d as the forth(IV) not the third(III). and if medeley writes 1983a EVERYONE who reads this will think (I) not (IV)
when people read this they will think i have no idea what i'm saying.
I MUST be (a)
II MUST be (b)
III MUST be (c)
and IV MUST be (d)
the order I reference them makes no difference.
also please make the view box size adjustable so i can read past the first few words of the title.
↧